Moved $400/mo from Google Ads to GEO experiments. 90 days later, here's what I can actually report.
Inês Pereira
🎯 AI cited a competitor — what fixed it
I run paid + SEO for a B2B SaaS. Convinced the team to carve $400/month out of the Google Ads budget to test whether GEO investments could produce comparable pipeline impact. That was 90 days ago.
Honest results, no spin:
What we did with the $400:
- $120/mo tracking tool (we use GEO Tracker, full disclosure)
- ~12 hrs/mo of my time on comparison pages and Reddit answers
- ~$80 on a freelancer to clean up our schema markup
- ~$60 on a small Otter.ai subscription to transcribe podcast appearances
What we got:
- Perplexity mention rate: 4% → 19% over 90 days (buyer-intent queries only)
- ChatGPT: 0% → 8% (slower, expected)
- Google AI Mode: 0% → 0% (we're in a niche that AI Mode still doesn't handle well, I think)
- 3 inbound demo requests that self-attributed to 'found you on Perplexity' in the form
What I still can't tell:
- Whether those 3 demos would have come from Google Ads anyway at a different attribution path
- Whether month 4-6 will compound or plateau
$400/mo from Google Ads didn't hurt performance metrics, for what it's worth. Jury is still out on whether GEO earned a permanent line item.
Anyone else running a structured budget comparison like this? Would love more data points.
Replies
No replies yet.
Be the first to reply.