Schema markup that moved the needle — and the kind that didn't
Milan Novák
🔧 Schema, llms.txt, technical fundamentals
Spent two weekends auditing schema.org markup across 6 client domains (I do GEO consulting on the side now).
Pattern I keep seeing:
Moves AI citations:
Organizationwithdescription+sameAs(X, LinkedIn, GitHub) +foundingDate— the most useful single block.Product/SoftwareApplicationwith explicitapplicationCategory+description.Articlewithauthor+datePublishedon long-form posts.
Doesn't move AI citations (in my testing):
BreadcrumbList(good for Google organic, AI engines ignore).- Excessive
FAQPage(>5 questions). AI engines seem to pick from FAQs only if the question matches exactly. WebPageboilerplate. Just noise.
One thing I haven't tested but suspect helps:
Personschema on the founder's profile page, linked back toOrganization.founder. The 'human story' angle seems to help AI cite us as more than 'just another SaaS.'
Counter-examples welcome.
Replies
No replies yet.
Be the first to reply.